EDITORIAL
TheStar.com | Opinion | Welfare's lousy diet
Welfare's lousy diet
Feb 23, 2009 04:30 AM

Welfare recipients are at high risk of obesity. That is because their diet is loaded with cheap carbohydrates.

They are also prone to high blood pressure. That is because there is so much salt in the canned foods and high-calorie snacks they eat.

They have a higher than normal incidence of diabetes (too much fat and sugar), anemia (too little iron), osteoporosis (too little calcium), and a host of other chronic diseases.

"When people don't have enough money to buy healthy food, they get sick," says Toronto's medical officer of health, David McKeown. "It's that simple."

Last week, McKeown joined anti-poverty activists, community workers and public health officials in a province-wide appeal to the Ontario government to provide a $100 healthy food supplement to all adults on welfare.

This would allow most welfare recipients to meet their minimum nutritional needs. In Toronto, according to the department of public health, a man needs $41 a week for a healthy diet, a woman needs $30 and children need up to $33, depending on their age and sex.

These amounts are out of reach on welfare. They'd still be a stretch with the proposed food supplement, but there'd be enough money for some fruits, vegetables, milk and meat or a high-protein substitute.

They'd be able to shop at a grocery store, rather than going to a food bank. They'd have more energy and resilience. The province would save on health-care costs.

If Premier Dalton McGuinty is sincere in his commitment to reduce poverty by 25 per cent within five years, tackling hunger in next month's budget would be a good start.

Comments on this story are moderated

expandContent
Sort By

I'm not really knocking anyone but...

A single person really can eat for a few bucks per day, you just have to learn to cook and shop. I decide on what I will eat today by getting things on sale. I only shop for sale items and buy lots for future use.Why anyone would go to a variety store and pay three times as much as a budget store charges for the same item is something I will never understand. We need more Giant tiger stores!

Submitted by makemyday at 11:23 AM Monday, February 23 2009

the answer lies in education

The poor do not have to eat this way. I can live off rice and beans for less than 10 bux a week if I had to. Its healthy nutritious...but people just dont know how to cook anymore.

Submitted by taitai at 10:57 AM Monday, February 23 2009

The working poor, those contributing should be first in line..Seniors, families working multiple jobs to pay ever increasing property tax.

Welfare isn't for a lifetime. My daughter, an MSW, clients on welfare all have cell phones, their kids have cell phones, designer clothes, smoke, eat at fast food places. This sense of entitlement has to stop. Anyone of welfare for more than afew years should be forced off after receiving lifeskills training, financial training, upgraded schooling (can read & write). No able bodied person should be on welfare beyond this. There are jobs out there for the taking but most Canadians turn their noses up at them. The system can't sustain you forever, nor was it meant to. It appears a number of bloggers here are on welfare, etc. They have computers, the internet. My neighbour (her house in her brother's name) on disability runs around the neighbourhood & collects her monthly cheque. I don't begrudge those who really need it but I do those who use the system with a sense of entitlement to things (computers, internet, cell phones) that most of us work very hard to get. Not on my dime.

Submitted by 4responsibility at 10:40 AM Monday, February 23 2009

Many issues

cannot be solved by throwing money at them, but improving access to a better diet is one that can. The many other issues around social assistance, including the attitudes of ignorant posters, will take much more.

Submitted by Northern Cynic at 10:30 AM Monday, February 23 2009

Welfare = Lousy Diet??? How about planning? Send them to classes on lifeskills, teach them how to budget, teach them new skills to get off welfare so it doesn't become generational.

When I didn't have a lot of money the kids got powdered milk, fruits & vegetables, meat on sale, bought in bulk used canned goods. Junk food is addictive & expensive. Our education system needs to teach meal preparation, finances, life-skills starting at grade 3 so if interim welfare is needed (its not a for-life system, although its used like it is), they will have the necessary skillsets to take care of themselves & their families. The Star has done stories in the past where families of 5 or more lived very well on very little (I think it was under $15,000 a year). Give a man a fish and he eats for a day, teach a man to fish and he eats for a lifetime. Gov't overseers 4 Welfare are falling down on the job. Give them food coupons, clothing coupons (my son going thru university shopped at the Salvation Army 4 his clothes), pay the rent directly to the landlord...these may be 'motivators' to get off.

Submitted by 4responsibility at 10:20 AM Monday, February 23 2009

There's a reason

This is going to sound mean but there's a reason and reasoning why people, who take that leap of faith to accept taxpayer payment as a entitlement and complain about the low amount of it, is the same mentality that just settles and forsakes the logic of eating higher fat, poorer carb foods.

Submitted by mustardman at 10:14 AM Monday, February 23 2009

This article is right on the ball.

People dont buy junk food simply because of choice. Welfare recipeients have no choice because their payments are so low so they have to get something even if its cheap (and unhealthy) Food stamps will work giving welfare recipients access to nutritious food. I hope McGuinty will address this in the upcoming budget because instead of throwing money at the health care sector (I'm not advocating for cuts),the Liberals should increase payments which will cut health care costs in the long-term. So instead of bailing out corporations (in which they're the biggest welfare recipients in Canada), that money should be diverted to the poor. It works.

Submitted by Vote NDP in the next federal/provincial election at 10:07 AM Monday, February 23 2009

not so Geraldine

Food stamps are not the answer. The food banks (for which I am eternally grateful for) are chock full of pasta/mac cheese, past due cakes and dented cans (food poisoning anyone?). At christmas I received some mandarins and cried. I hadn't seen a peice of fresh fruit for months.

Submitted by DMT at 9:54 AM Monday, February 23 2009

What about something for people who are not on welfare?

If the goal is the overall Health and fitness of citizens, then how about a tax credit for gym memberships for people who are NOT on welfare? This only makes sense now that we know that sedentary lifestyles are just as much to blame for obesity as a bad diet.

Submitted by gc1 at 9:53 AM Monday, February 23 2009

Excuse Me!

Just going by the first letter in comments it's apparent that there are those who remain convinced that those on welfare are buying junk food, and this punitive attitude towards the poor really has to stop. Mike Harris slashed welfare by 25 percent years ago, it was never restored, and the current government hasn't done much to rectify this. So, just to clarify things, the poor don't need to be taught how to cook, shop, or be thrifty, they need more money whether in the guise of coupons, stamps or some other form of subsidization. They need unconditional help and they need to be treated as something more than second class citizens.

Submitted by besiboo at 9:16 AM Monday, February 23 2009

Debit Card Welfare

A debit card system for welfare should be deployed, were by funds can only be spent on Food, Clothing and Housing. The funds couldn't be used for fast food items or Coffee. I'm surprised at people I know on the dole who spend money at Tim's everyday, were a kettle and instant would do just fine at less than a quarter of the price. Luxury items like Smokes, Beer and Bingo would also be restricted, they're not required and lead to other heath and social problems.. If you want them then find work period. I think people on welfare should eat properly etc, but I have a problem when the funds are wasted. Some people do not have the life skills to manage funds, this system would solve that.

Submitted by gba at 9:12 AM Monday, February 23 2009

Welfare cases.

Thats because they buy alcohol or cigarets before buying thier food. I remember living in london, you could tell the welfare cases just by looking at them, they are pale and the malnurishment shows

Submitted by goi at 9:08 AM Monday, February 23 2009

Page 1 of 2 < Prev Next >
Advertisement
Advertisement
SPECIAL
With layoffs stalking the media industry, I've been running through scenarios of what my husband and I would do if our names ever made ...
Energy and Infrastructure Minister George Smitherman will table today the government's new Green Energy Act, a much-anticipated ...
Howie Beck has indie cred to burn, good critical notices from both sides of the Atlantic, and a few fairly famous friends.

www.thestar.com.sharedcopy.com

carefulspider says...

I could be wrong but it seems that in areas where there is subsidized housing, there are no supermarkets to be seen (one comes to mind...the nearest grocery store is Richmond and Adelaide). In these same areas, variety stores are abundant. A person CAN eat for less than a few dollars a day if "push comes to shove"...it takes some planning and know how. Co-op kitchens are a great idea as you can get tips and they cook in bulk, pooling resources. One solution.